Our history

Fotograf: Ulrika Georgsson

The center has a history of more than 20 years and has become a credible, well known platform for life cycle experts in Sweden. It was founded as CPM in 1996 as a joint effort between Nutek (later VINNOVA), Chalmers University of Technology and a range of international companies. Over the years the center has concluded eight stages with different focus areas and partner constellations but the focus on applied life cycle thinking has remained as its base.

“Swedish Life Cycle Center has been instrumental for the development and adoption of the life cycle perspective in Swedish companies and has made important contributions to international standardization in the life cycle field.”

Anne-Marie Tillman, chair of The scientific advisory group.

Overview of the stages

Stage 1, 1996-1998: Develop structure, terminology & requirements

The beginning was to develop database structures, terminology and quality require­ments for life cycle data and how life cycle assessment (LCA) results ought to be implemented and evaluated.

Stage 2, 1998-2001. Focus on national database

Next step was to futher develop the database and gather data to build the national database that now is located at Swedish Life Cycle Center. As the knowledge and understanding within the partner companies had increased was the need for communicating also important. The initial steps were taken towards a shared communication format within the Environmen­tal Products Declaration, EDP, and Type III area.

Stage 3, 2001-2004: Extended scope to Life Cycle Costing & Environmental risk assessment

Knowledge of product´s environmental impact had grown and LCA could not answer all the new questions being asked. The scope was widened to include areas such as life cycle costing (LCC) and environmental risk assessment. Our main focuses here were tools and methods for sustainable development.

Stage 4, 2004-2006: Focus on applications of LCA results

The companies use of LCA in its current form has given them enough knowledge about existing products and they have moved on using LCA exclusively in research and development. This has led to focusing on the pratical applications of answers provided by LCA and a more defined connection between enivonmental thinking and economy. Result has primarily been about implementing results, and demonstrating the financial gains necessary to prove the companies are on the right track.

Stage 5, 2006-2009: Monetarisation and valuation in scope

During this period, the collaboration projects dealt with Eco-efficiency (EE) Extra Financial Analysis (EFA) and external costs of goods transport. The link to economic assessment and valuation was further explored as well.

Stage 6, 2009-2012: Communicating Life Cycle Thinking in value chain

Main focus was on communication and the spread of life cycle thinking through the value chain. Mainly in company operations and upstream, such as supply chain management, transportation and production. Parallel to the research projects, training for practitioners and operational wor­king groups were developed. The need for higher inter­national presence and recognition was identified as an opportunity for further development.

Stage 7, 2012-2015: Swedish Life Cycle Center becomes the new name

CPM – Center for environmental assessment of product and material systems, officially became Swedish Life Cycle Center, which expresses the broader perspective of the life cycle field. The stage has been characterized by new collaborations, increased internationalization and improved ways of working of the center management. A lot of effort were put on the organization of the 6th international conference on Life Cycle Management (LCM 2013) in Gothenburg. New working areas were social LCA, biodiversity issues and areas for further development were economic valuation, data quality and transparency. Another focus was implementation of life cycle thinking (LCT) in policy development.

Stage 8, 2016- onward: Influence national & international initiatives

Main focus is to strengthen the internal collaboration to better influence the national and international initiatives and take the lead on the international development. Important is also to increase the life cycle concepts outside the life cycle community for further implementation in business, policy and other parts of society. See operational plan for more detailed information.